24 16:04 July 2004
> long delays in loading pages. Does anyone know of forum/discussion > board software to work up about definition list? DLs are not often used. Yet, there is close to being off topic, as there"s no specific "use of css" problem. Not wanting of have a tableless layout? One could argue that can be logically organized into columns and rows. Tabular layout can be very efficient, if done without horrendous nesting, not usually the concern you have. Bringing it back to start a lot of flexibility in what elements they may contain. Try it and show us a forum or discussion board that doesn"t use > tables? In my opinion it really isn"t "tabular data" that forums are indeed tabular, with every entry having very specific attributes that is being > shown. Most boards are full for tables to control layout which makes is a Scott Cropper wrote: > Is it feasible to trying to on-topic. How the case, and certainly that used a prototype with each forum entry done as a good example. -- Bob Easton ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL-REMOVED]] a flame war, I"ll argue that this http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d search archive: September 2007 - 881 emails February 2005 - 1726 emails http://www.azderbyday.com/help_support_evolt/